Hi All.

*Gentle Reminder!*

Regards,
Gurusiddesh V N

On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 6:54 PM Acee Lindem (acee) <[email protected]> wrote:

> Gurusiddesh,
>
>
>
> I’ll defer to the RFC authors on your question. However, please refrain
> from referring to bits as being “unset”. They are set or clear.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Acee
>
>
>
> *From: *Lsr <[email protected]> on behalf of Gurusiddesh Nidasesi <
> [email protected]>
> *Date: *Monday, April 19, 2021 at 6:13 AM
> *To: *"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> *Cc: *Spencer Giacalone <[email protected]>, Stefano Previdi <
> [email protected]>, "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <[email protected]>,
> Dona Maria John <[email protected]>, Vikram Agrawal <
> [email protected]>, Mahalakshmi Kumar <
> [email protected]>
> *Subject: *[Lsr] Doubt regarding A bit set/unset
>
>
>
> Hi All,
>
>
>
> I had a query regarding setting/unsetting A bit.
>
>
>
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8570#section-4.1 states that
>
> A bit:  This field represents the Anomalous (A) bit.  The A bit is
>
>       set when the measured value of this parameter exceeds its
>
>       configured maximum threshold.  The A bit is cleared when the
>
>       measured value falls below its configured reuse threshold.  If the
>
>       A bit is cleared, the sub-TLV represents steady-state link
>
>       performance.
>
>
>
> So does it mean we have to have two configurations one for reuse and another 
> for maximum threshold?
>
> Will below example follow the RFC?
>
> reuse threshold : 50 usec
>
> maximum threshold : 100 usec
>
> 1st measured value : 110 usec
>
> conclusion: Set A bit.
>
>
>
> 2nd measured value : 75 usec
>
> conclusion : Do nothing (Maintain pervious state of A bit as the value is 
> less than reuse or greater than threshold)
>
>
>
> 3rd measurement value : 30 usec
>
> conclusion: Unset A bit.
>
>
>
>  If we have to have two configuration for threshold to set/unset A bit, will 
> they be different from the threshold that we use for advertisements?
>
>
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Gurusiddesh V N
>
>
> .
>


-- 
Thanks,
Gurusiddesh V N

-- 
.
_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr

Reply via email to