Hi Rob,
On 5/20/21, 5:11 AM, "Robert Wilton via Datatracker" <nore...@ietf.org> wrote:
Robert Wilton has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions-14: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi,
Thanks for this document.
In various places, this document references lists of numerical algorithm
numbers, or TLV Ids without any associated human names. I would have found
this document to be a bit more readable if the names of the algorithms and
TLVs
were also used alongside their numerical ids.
You mean like OSPF __? For better or worse, IS-IS has always referred to TLVs
by their numeric code point.
Thanks,
Acee
Thanks,
Rob
_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
Lsr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
