Hi, I support WG adoption of this draft.
It seems clear to me that protection for any constrained topology should use/prefer same constrains if available (with possible fallback to base if operator wishes so). Flexible algorithm based topologies should be no exception to this. And as a side note if using flexible algorithm solves real problems even if the same problems could be solved with MTR to me this is a feature not a bug to use simpler technology to accomplish the goal(s). Cheers, R. On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 10:59 PM Christian Hopps <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Folks, > > This begins a 2 week WG Adoption Call for the following draft: > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-peng-lsr-algorithm-related-adjacency-sid/ > > Please indicate your support or objections by June 9th, 2021 > > Authors, please respond to the list indicating whether you are aware of > any IPR that applies to this draft. > > Thanks, > Acee and Chris. > > _______________________________________________ > Lsr mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr >
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
