Hi Shraddha,
> 3.Advertising generic metric in an application independent manner in > legacy TLV 22 and ELO LSA > does not violate RFC 8919/8920. Application-independent attributes are not > expected to use RFC 8919/8920 > mechanisms. Generic metric is like igp cost. IGP-cost is never advertised > in ASLA but it gets used in flex-algo > and generic-metric is being modeled based on igp-cost. > As currently written, this document is compliant to every RFC and draft > that has > been out there and not violating any of them. To me it does violate section 12 of IGP Flexible Algorithm draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-17 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-17#section-12 12. Advertisement of Link Attributes for Flex-Algorithm Various link attributes may be used during the Flex-Algorithm path calculation. For example, include or exclude rules based on link affinities can be part of the Flex-Algorithm definition as defined in Section 6 and Section 7. *Link attribute advertisements that are to be used during Flex- Algorithm calculation MUST use the Application-Specific Link Attribute (ASLA) advertisements defined in [RFC8919] or [RFC8920],* * ...* Many thx, Robert.
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
