I support progression of this document. Regarding the new registry being requested in Section 8.2, given that the registry applies to both OSPF and IS-IS codepoints, I think it would make more sense to place the registry under Interior Gateway Protocol (IGP) Parameters rather than under OSPF.
Les From: Lsr <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Acee Lindem (acee) Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2021 9:46 AM To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Subject: [Lsr] WG Last Call for IGP extension for PCEP security capability support in the PCE discovery - draft-ietf-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support-05 This begins a 3-week WG Last Call, ending on August 4th, 2021, for draft-ietf-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support. Please indicate your support or objection to this list before the end of the WG last call. The longer WG last call is to account for IETF week. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support/ Thanks, Acee
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
