Removing John as he hasn't followed the IETF for decades.
I believe the intention of the text is to reference Figure 9. However, the
terminology is confusing. I would remove the reference to "dashed". See
suggested corrections to line 3 and 6 of the paragraph below.
Corrected Text
--------------
The area border routers RT3, RT4, RT7, RT10 and RT11 condense
the routing information of their attached non-backbone areas for
distribution via the backbone; these are the stub costs that
appear in Figure 8. Remember that the third area has been
configured to condense Networks N9-N11 and Host H1 into a single
route. This yields a single line for networks N9-N11 and
Host H1 in Figure 8. Routers RT5 and RT7 are AS boundary
routers; their externally derived information also appears on
the graph in Figure 8 as stubs.
Thanks,
Acee
On 9/7/21, 9:33 AM, "Lsr on behalf of RFC Errata System" <[email protected]
on behalf of [email protected]> wrote:
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC2328,
"OSPF Version 2".
--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6679
--------------------------------------
Type: Editorial
Reported by: Nikolai Malykh <[email protected]>
Section: 3.4
Original Text
-------------
The area border routers RT3, RT4, RT7, RT10 and RT11 condense
the routing information of their attached non-backbone areas for
distribution via the backbone; these are the dashed stubs that
appear in Figure 8. Remember that the third area has been
configured to condense Networks N9-N11 and Host H1 into a single
route. This yields a single dashed line for networks N9-N11 and
Host H1 in Figure 8. Routers RT5 and RT7 are AS boundary
routers; their externally derived information also appears on
the graph in Figure 8 as stubs.
Corrected Text
--------------
The area border routers RT3, RT4, RT7, RT10 and RT11 condense
the routing information of their attached non-backbone areas for
distribution via the backbone; these are the dashed stubs that
appear in Figure 6. Remember that the third area has been
configured to condense Networks N9-N11 and Host H1 into a single
route. This yields a single dashed line for networks N9-N11 and
Host H1 in Figure 8. Routers RT5 and RT7 are AS boundary
routers; their externally derived information also appears on
the graph in Figure 8 as stubs.
Notes
-----
Incorrect figure number (8 instead 6).
Instructions:
-------------
This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
--------------------------------------
RFC2328 (no draft string recorded)
--------------------------------------
Title : OSPF Version 2
Publication Date : April 1998
Author(s) : J. Moy
Category : INTERNET STANDARD
Source : Open Shortest Path First IGP
Area : Routing
Stream : IETF
Verifying Party : IESG
_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
