I reviewed the draft and believe it is ready for WG adoption. From my 
perspective, it is pretty clear other than that the congestion control 
algorithm wasn't intuitive. However, that could be due to my unfamiliarity with 
"TCP Congestion Control" as described in RFC 5681. We plan to start a WG 
adoption poll at the IETF 112 LSR meeting. 

Please read as well as the other drafts on the IETF 112 agenda - 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/112/session/lsr

Thanks,
Acee

On 10/22/21, 12:38 PM, "Lsr on behalf of Acee Lindem (acee)" 
<[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote:

    Thanks Bruno, Les, Tony Li, and Guillaume Solignac for your work on the 
merged draft. Also thanks to Tony Przygienda and Peter Psenak who participated 
in the merged draft discussions. 

    I plan to review it this weekend and would ask other WG members to read as 
well. 

    Thanks,
    Acee 

    On 10/22/21, 9:10 AM, "Lsr on behalf of [email protected]" 
<[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote:

        Dear all,

        During LSR interim meeting on September 29th [0] authors of 
draft-decraene-lsr-isis-flooding-speed [1] and 
draft-ginsberg-lsr-isis-flooding-scale [2] agreed to work together and publish 
a common combined draft by October 25 [3].

        New draft has been published today [4]. As presented during the 
interim, it's scope is:
        - Define new TLV supporting:
        -- InterfaceLSPReceiveWindow (RWIN)
        -- LSP/PSNPThreshold(LPP)
        -- partialSNPInterval(milliseconds)
        -- Extensible to advertise other values
        - TLV supported in IIHs and PSNPs

        This provides tools for multiple solutions and the draft informatively 
describes two algorithm as examples.

        Review and comments is more than welcome.

        Thanks,
        Regards,
        Authors

        [0] https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/lsr/meetings/
        [1] 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-decraene-lsr-isis-flooding-speed
        [2] 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ginsberg-lsr-isis-flooding-scale
        [3] 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/interim-2021-lsr-01/materials/slides-interim-2021-lsr-01-sessa-1-joint-statement-00.pdf
        [4] 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-decraeneginsberg-lsr-isis-fast-flooding





        Orange Restricted

        -----Original Message-----
        From: [email protected] <[email protected]> 
        Sent: Friday, October 22, 2021 10:55 AM
        To: DECRAENE Bruno INNOV/NET <[email protected]>; Chris Bowers 
<[email protected]>; Guillaume Solignac <[email protected]>; Gunter Van 
de Velde <[email protected]>; Les Ginsberg <[email protected]>; 
Marek Karasek <[email protected]>; Peter Psenak <[email protected]>; Tony Li 
<[email protected]>; Tony Przygienda <[email protected]>
        Subject: New Version Notification for 
draft-decraeneginsberg-lsr-isis-fast-flooding-00.txt


        A new version of I-D, 
draft-decraeneginsberg-lsr-isis-fast-flooding-00.txt
        has been successfully submitted by Bruno Decraene and posted to the
        IETF repository.

        Name:           draft-decraeneginsberg-lsr-isis-fast-flooding
        Revision:       00
        Title:          IS-IS Fast Flooding
        Document date:  2021-10-22
        Group:          Individual Submission
        Pages:          24
        URL:            
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-decraeneginsberg-lsr-isis-fast-flooding-00.txt
        Status:         
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-decraeneginsberg-lsr-isis-fast-flooding/
        Htmlized:       
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-decraeneginsberg-lsr-isis-fast-flooding


        Abstract:
           Current Link State Protocol Data Unit (PDU) flooding rates are much
           slower than what modern networks can support.  The use of IS-IS at
           larger scale requires faster flooding rates to achieve desired
           convergence goals.  This document discusses the need for faster
           flooding, the issues around faster flooding, and some example
           approaches to achieve faster flooding.  It also defines protocol
           extensions relevant to faster flooding.




        The IETF Secretariat


        
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

        Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations 
confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
        pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez 
recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
        a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les 
messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
        Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme 
ou falsifie. Merci.

        This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged 
information that may be protected by law;
        they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
        If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and 
delete this message and its attachments.
        As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have 
been modified, changed or falsified.
        Thank you.

        _______________________________________________
        Lsr mailing list
        [email protected]
        https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr

    _______________________________________________
    Lsr mailing list
    [email protected]
    https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr

_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr

Reply via email to