On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 12:07 PM Peter Psenak <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Henning, > > > In chapter 6.1-6.3 (7.1-7.3 for OSPF) you define a subset of "boolean > > algebra" > > among the extended admin groups. I assume that more complex boolean > > conditions > > are not necessary for most deployments (and could be done by defining more > > EAGs > > that represent the specific condition)? > > ##PP > the include/exclude rules that we defined have been used in traditional > RSVP-TE for a long time. They have proved to be sufficient. We can > always add more if needed in the future.
I wonder if it can make sense to allow multiple include/exclude-All TLVs and define the "ANY logic" based on the fact that it's enough that one sub-TLV "ALL" condition is met. This might allow for a more flexible system, but I am not sure it's worth the complexity in this case. Henning Rogge _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
