Do not support its publication. Very curious which operator will have such network design that the L1 routers locate in the middle but the L2 routers sits around them. There are also situations that the sub-optimal forwarding path will be emerged as also described in the draft which indicates such design and solutions should be carefully reviewed and operated in real deployment. The operations challenges surpasses the scalability advantages that it claims.
Aijun Wang China Telecom > On Dec 3, 2021, at 23:00, Acee Lindem (acee) > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Speaking as WG Co-Chair: > > While not mandatory for advancement, I’d really like for some the long-time > IS-IS contributors to review the draft. You know who you are… > > Thanks, > Acee > > From: Lsr <[email protected]> on behalf of "Acee Lindem (acee)" > <[email protected]> > Date: Monday, November 22, 2021 at 2:48 PM > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Subject: [Lsr] WG Last Call fo "IS-IS Flood Reflection" > -draft-ietf-lsr-isis-flood-reflection-05 > > This begins the WG Last for draft-ietf-lsr-isis-flood-reflection-05. Please > post your support or objection to this list by 12:00 AM UTC on Dec 14th , > 2021. Also please post your comments on the draft. I’m allowing as extra week > as I like to get some additional reviews – although my comments have been > addressed. > > Thanks, > Acee > > _______________________________________________ > Lsr mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
