Hi,

I'm afraid the draft has some serious issues that would need to be addressed if it is to become a WG document.

Below comments use ISIS as an example, but most of it applies to OSPF as well.


1. The draft says:

"ISIS[RFC5316] defines the Inter-AS Reachability TLV to carry the TE
 information about inter-AS links.  This TLV can be used to transfer
 the information about the stub link which is located at the boundary
 of one AS.  This document defines the Stub-Link sub-TLV within this
 TLV to identify the stub link and transfer the associated attributes."

- there is an existing mechanisms to advertise inter-AS link. There is existing mechanisms to advertise external prefix. What exactly is the reason to define a new TLV?

It's still not clear to me what exactly is the use case for the new TLVs defined in the document.

2. Looking at the proposed ISIS Stub-link Sub-TLV, which is a sub-TLV of the existing Inter-AS Reachability TLV:

- it advertises prefix. The advertisement of the prefix and link information is strictly decoupled in ISIS. Here the proposal is to advertise the prefix inside the Inter-AS Reachability TLV, which is advertising a link. Why do we need the prefix of the inter-AS link to be advertised inside the link advertisement?

2. The new ISIS Stub-link Sub-TLV includes sub-TLVs, the text says:

 "Sub-TLVs: Existing sub-TLVs that defined within "Sub-TLVs for TLVs
   22, 23, 25, 141, 222, and 223" can be included if necessary."

The parent Inter-AS Reachability TLV already has Sub-TLVs from the exact same space. Not to mention that the new sub-TLV itself comes from the same space. Looks broken.

3. Link Type in ISIS Stub-link Sub-TLV - what is it used for and why do we need it?


thanks,
Peter



On 04/01/2022 07:58, Christian Hopps wrote:
Hi Folks,

This begins a 2 week WG Adoption Call for the following draft:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wang-lsr-stub-link-attributes/

Please indicate your support or objections by January 18th, 2022.

Authors, please respond to the list indicating whether you are aware of any IPR 
that applies to these drafts.

Thanks,
Chris.

_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
Lsr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr


_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
Lsr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr

Reply via email to