Hi,
as I was unable to make my comments during the presentation, let me put
them here:
When we started with the flex-algo work, there has been a lengthy
discussion on why not to use the multi-topology (MT) instead. We always
wanted flex-algo to be light weight and as a result easy to deploy and
manage. I believe that was one of the reasons why flex-algo has been
successfully deployed. We do not want to loose that very property of the
flex-algo architecture.
What you are proposing is what MT was invented for and we do not want
flex-algo to become a new version of MT.
You have two ways to solve your problem:
a) use MT
b) if you want to solve your problem with flex-algo, please use what
already exists in flex-algo. Please look at
draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-bw-con as others have pointed out.
thanks,
Peter
_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
