Aijun,
On 09/08/2022 05:35, Aijun Wang wrote:
Hi,
I am wondering why we are so hurry to obsolete RFC8919, given that only the
minor parts are updated (mainly the zero length SABM/UABM, and other
interoperability issues).
There may be other methods to advertise the application specific attributes.
From my POV, the rules, implementation of ASLA are still complex, the
deployment of them are challenging.
Is there any real deployment for RFC8919 until now?
sure there are deployments of it. Flex-algo is built around RFC8919, so
any network where flex-algo is used with ISIS is using RFC8919.
Peter
Best Regards
Aijun Wang
China Telecom
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Christian
Hopps
Sent: Monday, August 8, 2022 6:17 PM
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: [Lsr] WG adoption call for draft-ginsberg-lsr-rfc8919bis-02
Hi Folks,
This begins a 2 week WG Adoption Call for the following draft:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ginsberg-lsr-rfc8919bis/
Please indicate your support or objections by August 22nd, 2022.
Authors, please respond to the list indicating whether you are aware of any
IPR that applies to these drafts.
Thanks,
Chris.
_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
