Agreed. This is clearly documented section 10.6 on page 100.
Thanks,
Acee

On 9/1/22, 4:52 PM, "Lsr on behalf of John Scudder" <[email protected] on 
behalf of [email protected]> wrote:

    This looks right. If there are any objections to verifying it, please let 
me know.

    —John

    > On Sep 1, 2022, at 2:39 PM, RFC Errata System <[email protected]> 
wrote:
    > 
    > 
    > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC2328,
    > "OSPF Version 2".
    > 
    > --------------------------------------
    > You may review the report below and at:
    > 
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7112__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!FJynD-y4c4yWDb91yTvFViobefnoM7wxDCIcBMiV4r0jFG8WE4jsCzW7xMBABvx2TwtPDHYBucjBuYoTMPupgw$
    > 
    > --------------------------------------
    > Type: Editorial
    > Reported by: Renato Westphal <[email protected]>
    > 
    > Section: 10.2
    > 
    > Original Text
    > -------------
    >        NegotiationDone
    >            The Master/Slave relationship has been negotiated, and DD
    >            sequence numbers have been exchanged.  This signals the
    >            start of the sending/receiving of Database Description
    >            packets.  For more information on the generation of this
    >            event, consult Section 10.8.
    > 
    > Corrected Text
    > --------------
    >        NegotiationDone
    >            The Master/Slave relationship has been negotiated, and DD
    >            sequence numbers have been exchanged.  This signals the
    >            start of the sending/receiving of Database Description
    >            packets.  For more information on the generation of this
    >            event, consult Section 10.6.
    > 
    > Notes
    > -----
    > The generation of the NegotiationDone event is specified in Section 10.6 
(not Section 10.8).
    > 
    > Instructions:
    > -------------
    > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
    > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
    > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party
    > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
    > 
    > --------------------------------------
    > RFC2328 (no draft string recorded)
    > --------------------------------------
    > Title               : OSPF Version 2
    > Publication Date    : April 1998
    > Author(s)           : J. Moy
    > Category            : INTERNET STANDARD
    > Source              : Open Shortest Path First IGP
    > Area                : Routing
    > Stream              : IETF
    > Verifying Party     : IESG

    _______________________________________________
    Lsr mailing list
    [email protected]
    https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr

_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr

Reply via email to