The following errata report has been submitted for RFC3277,
"Intermediate System to Intermediate System (IS-IS) Transient Blackhole 
Avoidance".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7127

--------------------------------------
Type: Editorial
Reported by: John Scudder <[email protected]>

Section: 2

Original Text
-------------
   As such, it is recommended that each time a router establishes an
   adjacency, it will update its LSP and flood it immediately, even
   before beginning database synchronization.  This will allow for the
   Overload bit setting to propagate immediately, and remove the
   potential for an older version of the reloaded routers LSP to be
   used.


Corrected Text
--------------
   As such, it is recommended that each time a router establishes an
   adjacency, it will update its LSP and flood it immediately, even
   before beginning database synchronization.  This will allow for the
   Overload bit setting to propagate immediately, and remove the
   potential for an older version of the reloaded router's LSP to be
   used.


Notes
-----
"reloaded router's" should be possessive singular.

Instructions:
-------------
This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC3277 (draft-ietf-isis-transient-02)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Intermediate System to Intermediate System (IS-IS) 
Transient Blackhole Avoidance
Publication Date    : April 2002
Author(s)           : D. McPherson
Category            : INFORMATIONAL
Source              : IS-IS for IP Internets
Area                : Routing
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG

_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr

Reply via email to