Hi Roman,

Thanks for your review and please check inline below for responses.

We've just posted an update:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-l2bundles-07


On Wed, Oct 5, 2022 at 1:39 AM Roman Danyliw via Datatracker <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-l2bundles-06: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to
> https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/
> for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-l2bundles/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Thank you to Russ Mundy for the SECDIR review.
>
> I support Lars Eggert DISCUSS position.


KT> The update just posted includes text to address Lar's DISCUSS.


> It would be clearer if the the Y/N
> status indicated by Figure 2 were document via an additional column in the
>
> https://www.iana.org/assignments/ospfv2-parameters/ospfv2-parameters.xhtml#extended-link-tlv-sub-tlvs
> registry.  Same observation for Y/N/X in Figure 3 and
>
> https://www.iana.org/assignments/ospfv3-parameters/ospfv3-parameters.xhtml#extended-lsa-sub-tlvs
> .
>

KT> This point was brought up during John's AD review. It was also
discussed in the WG and it was felt that what was required was a more
significant reorganization of some of the registries in question. That
change was therefore reverted. You can find the details on this thread:
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/_6koX4oRfHT9LNfs2XoVOMfk2S8/

Thanks,
Ketan
_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr

Reply via email to