Erik Kline has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-24: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- # Internet AD comments for {draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-24} CC @ekline ## Comments ### S6.4, S7.4 * Is it safer to perhaps say that the M-flag is not only "not applicable" for SRv6 locators but add some kind of "MUST NOT be sent" and "MUST be ignored" ~type clauses? S8 has this kind of language and I think it may help grab the attention of an implementer. ### S9 * Should there be any qualifications here for SRv6 locator prefixes? _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
