Hi Alvaro, Thanks for your review and comment.
I agree that there is a need to cover the part about the info from this new TLV going into the BGP-LS TLV specified in RFC9085. Have added a section to cover this. Also marking "updates" RFC9085 based on your suggestion. We have posted an update that reflects this changes and look for your feedback on the same: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-l2bundles-08 Thanks, Ketan On Thu, Oct 6, 2022 at 7:06 AM Alvaro Retana via Datatracker < nore...@ietf.org> wrote: > Alvaro Retana has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-l2bundles-07: Yes > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to > https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ > for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-l2bundles/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > When the L2 Bundle Member Attributes TLV for BGP-LS was specified in > rfc9085, > the OSPF functionality (in this document) was not defined. > > It would be great if this document formally Updated rfc9085 to indicate > that > the information for the L2 Bundle Member Attributes TLV can also be derived > from the L2 Bundle Member Attributes sub-TLV. > > > >
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
