Christian Hopps <[email protected]> writes:
Why did we explicitly define multi-part TLVs?
I offer this as an answer to my own question:
We have the standard (RFC5303) which defined sub-tlvs in IS-IS, and says this in "3.
The Extended IS Reachability TLV"
"There is no defined mechanism for extending the sub-TLV space.
Thus, wasting sub-TLV space is discouraged."
Thanks,
Chris.
[as wg-member]
_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
