Hi Murray,

Thanks for your review and please find below responses inline.

These changes will be reflected in the upcoming update for the document.


On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 9:37 PM Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-reverse-metric-12: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to
> https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/
> for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-reverse-metric/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Apologies for being late to the party.  Just a few things to add beyond the
> feedback my colleagues have already provided:
>
> The first sentence in Section 2.2 uses the phrase "toward the core" three
> times.  Seems like it could do with some common factoring.
>

KT> Updated.


>
> There's a SHOULD at the bottom of Section 6.  Why's it only a SHOULD?  When
> might an implementer legitimately decide to do something else?
>

KT> Thanks for catching that. Based on discussion with Alvaro, I changed
the SHOULD to a qualified MUST earlier in section 6 related to the reverse
metric but missed making a similar change for the TE reverse metric.


>
> In Section 9, I suggest making it explicit that you're talking about the
> "Link
> Local Signalling TLV Identifiers" registry in the "Open Shortest Path First
> (OSPF) Link Local Signalling (LLS) - Type/Length/Value Identifiers (TLV)"
> registry group.
>

KT> Fixed.

Thanks,
Ketan
_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr

Reply via email to