Robert, thanks for the review * tunnel level, ok, I clarify that it means "by some mechanism the tunnel type supports" * good catch on 01/02, it's actually R10 and R11
-- tony On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 5:32 PM Robert Wilton via Datatracker < [email protected]> wrote: > Robert Wilton has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-lsr-isis-flood-reflection-11: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to > https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ > for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-isis-flood-reflection/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Hi, > > Thanks for this document, I found it pretty clear and easy to read > (although, I > skipped the TLV specifications). > > A couple of minor comments/nits that may help improve the doc: > > Minor level comments: > > (1) p 18, sec 9. Security Considerations > > subversion of the IS-IS level 2 information. Therefore, at tunnel > level steps should be taken to prevent such injection. > > I didn't find the term "tunnel level" to be particularly clear, either > here, or > below. > > Nit level comments: > > (2) p 8, sec 3. Further Details > > One possible solution to this problem is to expose additional > topology information into the L2 flooding domains. In the example > network given, links from router 01 to router 02 can be exposed into > L2 even when 01 and 02 are participating in flood reflection. This > information would allow the L2 nodes to build 'shortcuts' when the L2 > flood reflected part of the topology looks more expensive to cross > distance wise. > > Should 01 and 02 be R1 and R2 respectively? > > Regards, > Rob > > > > _______________________________________________ > Lsr mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr >
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
