Authors and Reviewers, Thanks for the work on this OSPF enhancement to support existing IS-IS function.
Acee > On Dec 21, 2022, at 2:49 AM, [email protected] wrote: > > A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. > > > RFC 9339 > > Title: OSPF Reverse Metric > Author: K. Talaulikar, Ed., > P. Psenak, > H. Johnston > Status: Standards Track > Stream: IETF > Date: December 2022 > Mailbox: [email protected], > [email protected], > [email protected] > Pages: 11 > Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None > > I-D Tag: draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-reverse-metric-13.txt > > URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9339 > > DOI: 10.17487/RFC9339 > > This document specifies the extensions to OSPF that enable a router > to use Link-Local Signaling (LLS) to signal the metric that receiving > OSPF neighbor(s) should use for a link to the signaling router. When > used on the link to the signaling router, the signaling of this > reverse metric (RM) allows a router to influence the amount of > traffic flowing towards itself. In certain use cases, this enables > routers to maintain symmetric metrics on both sides of a link between > them. > > This document is a product of the Link State Routing Working Group of the > IETF. > > This is now a Proposed Standard. > > STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track > protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions > for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official > Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the > standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this > memo is unlimited. > > This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. > To subscribe or unsubscribe, see > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce > https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist > > For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search > For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk > > Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the > author of the RFC in question, or to [email protected]. Unless > specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for > unlimited distribution. > > > The RFC Editor Team > Association Management Solutions, LLC > > > _______________________________________________ > Lsr mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
