FYI: no changes.

Tony


> Begin forwarded message:
> 
> From: [email protected]
> Subject: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-lsr-isis-area-proxy-09.txt
> Date: March 12, 2023 at 9:40:42 AM PDT
> To: "Gyan S. Mishra" <[email protected]>, "Gyan Mishra" 
> <[email protected]>, "Sarah Chen" <[email protected]>, "Tony Li" 
> <[email protected]>, "Vivek Ilangovan" <[email protected]>
> 
> 
> A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-lsr-isis-area-proxy-09.txt
> has been successfully submitted by Tony Li and posted to the
> IETF repository.
> 
> Name:         draft-ietf-lsr-isis-area-proxy
> Revision:     09
> Title:                Area Proxy for IS-IS
> Document date:        2023-03-12
> Group:                lsr
> Pages:                20
> URL:            
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-lsr-isis-area-proxy-09.txt
> Status:         
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-isis-area-proxy/
> Htmlized:       
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-lsr-isis-area-proxy
> Diff:           
> https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-lsr-isis-area-proxy-09
> 
> Abstract:
>   Link state routing protocols have hierarchical abstraction already
>   built into them.  However, when lower levels are used for transit,
>   they must expose their internal topologies to each other, leading to
>   scale issues.
> 
>   To avoid this, this document discusses extensions to the IS-IS
>   routing protocol that would allow level 1 areas to provide transit,
>   yet only inject an abstraction of the level 1 topology into level 2.
>   Each level 1 area is represented as a single level 2 node, thereby
>   enabling greater scale.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> The IETF Secretariat
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr

Reply via email to