That explains it and it is actually the right thing to do from the perspective of the IETF document process.
https://www.rfc-editor.org/materials/abbrev.expansion.txt Note that LSP is not asterisked as being well known and “Label Switched Path” is the first alternative. It should always be expanded on first use. The Editorial Errata should be accepted. This is something we should watch for in documents specifying IS-IS. Thanks, Acee > On Mar 27, 2023, at 11:58 PM, Robert Raszuk <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Barry, > > Looks like RFC Editor expanded the "LSP" abbreviation as version -26 (last > before publication) says this: > > The IS-IS FAD Sub-TLV MAY be advertised in an LSP of any number. IS- > IS router MAY advertise more than one IS-IS FAD Sub-TLV for a given > Flexible Algorithm (see Section 6). > > > Rgs, > R. > > > On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 8:34 PM RFC Errata System <[email protected]> > wrote: > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC9350, > "IGP Flexible Algorithm". > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7406 > > -------------------------------------- > Type: Editorial > Reported by: Barry Friedman <[email protected]> > > Section: 5.1 > > Original Text > ------------- > The IS-IS FAD sub-TLV MAY be advertised in a > Label Switched Path (LSP) of any number. > > Corrected Text > -------------- > The IS-IS FAD sub-TLV MAY be advertised in a > Link State PDU (LSP) of any number. > > Notes > ----- > I assume LSP is meant to refer to the PDU carrying the FAD, not a Label > Switched Path. > > Instructions: > ------------- > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > > -------------------------------------- > RFC9350 (draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-26) > -------------------------------------- > Title : IGP Flexible Algorithm > Publication Date : February 2023 > Author(s) : P. Psenak, Ed., S. Hegde, C. Filsfils, K. Talaulikar, > A. Gulko > Category : PROPOSED STANDARD > Source : Link State Routing > Area : Routing > Stream : IETF > Verifying Party : IESG > > _______________________________________________ > Lsr mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr > _______________________________________________ > Lsr mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
