On May 24, 2023 at 10:07:22 AM, Éric Vyncke wrote: Hi Éric!
... > I find interesting that this update to be more inclusive has non-inclusive > abstract and introduction... There are more than 200 countries (if not > mistaken) and readers can genuinely wonder which one is referred by "National > Institute of Standards and Technology" (of course, most readers knowing the > IETF will guess the NIST of the USA). Yes, sorry. We'll change that to "US NIST", as referred to in the IESG statement. > I also wonder whether IANA should keep the old name of the L bit in a > footnote or so. The whole point of changing the name is to eliminate/remove the non-inclusive language. Keeping the old name in the registry would not achoeve that goal. Thanks! Alvaro. _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
