Rob - Thanx for the review. Yes, the update to the Introduction was done in response to Warren's comment. Some offline discussion resulted in adding this to the Introduction rather than the Abstract.
Les > -----Original Message----- > From: Robert Wilton via Datatracker <nore...@ietf.org> > Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2023 1:13 AM > To: The IESG <i...@ietf.org> > Cc: draft-ietf-lsr-rfc8920...@ietf.org; lsr-cha...@ietf.org; lsr@ietf.org; > cho...@chopps.org; cho...@chopps.org > Subject: Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-lsr-rfc8920bis-04: (with > COMMENT) > > Robert Wilton has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-lsr-rfc8920bis-04: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to > https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot- > positions/ > for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-rfc8920bis/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Thanks for this update. > > I reviewed the diff for -04, and then saw Warren's ballot comment against -02. > I don't know if the intent is that Warren's comment has already been > addressed, > but I would give a +1 to a sentence in the introduction briefly explaining the > update and forward referencing section 15. > > Regards, > Rob > > _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
