Andrew - Thanx for the review.
S-bit is dataplane independent because it is applicable to both SR-MPLS and SRv6. Les > -----Original Message----- > From: Andrew Alston via Datatracker <nore...@ietf.org> > Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2023 6:09 AM > To: The IESG <i...@ietf.org> > Cc: draft-ietf-lsr-rfc8919...@ietf.org; lsr-cha...@ietf.org; lsr@ietf.org; > cho...@chopps.org; cho...@chopps.org > Subject: Andrew Alston's No Objection on draft-ietf-lsr-rfc8919bis-03: (with > COMMENT) > > Andrew Alston has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-lsr-rfc8919bis-03: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to > https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot- > positions/ > for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-rfc8919bis/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Hi There, > > Thanks for the document and for attempts to clarify things. By way of one > non-blocking comment, and just for my own understanding, I'd like to > understand > why the S-Bit (Segment Routing Policy) has been explicitly denoted dataplane > independent. > > This comment equally applies to draft-ietf-lsr-rfc8920bis > > Thanks > > Andrew > > _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
