Hi Robert,
On 05/06/2023 12:55, Robert Wilton via Datatracker wrote:
Robert Wilton has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-lsr-ip-flexalgo-12: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to
https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-ip-flexalgo/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi,
Thanks for this document.
Only one minor comment/question:
(1) p 4, sec 5.1. The IS-IS IP Algorithm Sub-TLV
The use of the IP Algorithm Sub-TLV to advertise support for
algorithms outside the Flex-Algorithm range (128-255) is outside the
scope of this document.
What does this actually mean if a router receives a SubTlV containing an
algorithm outside the 128-255 range? Should it ignore, or error? And should
this be specified in this document? I also note that this is stated here,
under IS-IS, but there is no equivalent text for the OSPF definition, and hence
wanted to ensure that is intentional.
fair comment.
I will make it clear that algo outside of the flex-algo range MUST be
ignored and state the same for OSPF.
thanks,
Peter
Regards,
Rob
_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
