Paul Wouters has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-lsr-ip-flexalgo-13: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to 
https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-ip-flexalgo/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

NITS:

        A node MUST participate in a Flex-Algorithm to be:
        - Able to compute path for such Flex-Algorithm
        - Part of the topology for such Flex-Algorithm

This is an odd use of MUST.

Section 5.2 states the length of the Algorithm field, but not
of the Type: or Length: fields. (either do it for all or for none?)

Similar in Section 6.2 and 6.3.1



_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr

Reply via email to