Hi Zahed, Thanks for your review.
In relation to your comment about rate-limiting of logging, I was not able to readily find a reference. However, all implementations that I have worked on over the years have a mechanism to limit/throttle the logging of events that can be repeated in nature. Thanks, Ketan On Thu, Jun 8, 2023 at 10:15 AM Zaheduzzaman Sarker via Datatracker < [email protected]> wrote: > Zaheduzzaman Sarker has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions-12: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to > https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ > for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Thanks for the specification. > > I have one question that I would like to get a response to as I believe it > will > add clarity in the specification. I says - > > Sub-TLVs SHOULD be rate-limited to prevent a Denial of Service (DoS) > attack > (distributed or otherwise) from overloading the OSPFv3 control plane. > > Is there a description on the rate-limitation that can be referenced here > so > that we understand it better? > > > >
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
