HI Victoria, Your comments will be incorporated into the -21 version when the draft submission opens back up.
> On Jul 19, 2023, at 11:39 AM, Victoria Pritchard <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hello, > > Firstly, sorry for the delay - I missed the notification I'd been assigned to > this review. > > I have been selected as the Routing Directorate reviewer for this draft. The > Routing Directorate seeks to review all routing or routing-related drafts as > they pass through IETF last call and IESG review, and sometimes on special > request. The purpose of the review is to provide assistance to the Routing > ADs. For more information about the Routing Directorate, please see > https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/rtg/RtgDir > > Although these comments are primarily for the use of the Routing ADs, it > would be helpful if you could consider them along with any other IETF Last > Call comments that you receive, and strive to resolve them through discussion > or by updating the draft. > > Document: draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-extended-lsa-yang-20 > Reviewer: Victoria Pritchard > Review Date: 19/07/2023 > IETF LC End Date: unknown > Intended Status: Standards Track > > Summary: > > This document is basically ready for publication but has nits that should > be considered prior to publication. > > Comments: > > Generally really clear and nicely references RFC 8362 throughout. > > Nits: > > Description at the top of page 19 didn't make sense to me. Is the "disabling" > bit a separate sentence, and if so, is the first sentence finished?: > "For regular areas, i.e., areas where AS-scoped LSAs > disabling AreaExtendedLSASupport for a regular > OSPFv3 area (not a Stub or NSSA area) when > ExtendedLSASupport is enabled is contradictory and > is prohibited."; I agree that this is confusing. I improved upon the description. "For regular areas, i.e., areas where AS-scoped LSAs are flooded, disabling AreaExtendedLSASupport at the area level is prohibited when ExtendedLSASupport is enabled at the instance level. AS-External LSAs are flooded into all OSPFv3 regular areas (i.e., not a stub or an NSSA area) and disabling support at the area level is not possible."; > > Typo in section 5 security considerations: vlunerability Fixed. Thanks, Acee > > > Kind regards, > Victoria. _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
