Muthu,
On 14/08/2023 02:44, Muthu Arul Mozhi Perumal wrote:
Hi,
draft-ietf-lsr-rfc8919bis defines the F-bit in SABM as:
F-bit: Set to specify Loop-Free Alternate (LFA) (includes all LFA
types).
Does all LFA types mean LFA/RLFA/DLFA/TI-LFA as an application?
if you need to advertise specific link-attributes for the purpose of
the LFA, you use the F-bit with ASLA. This includes all variants of the LFA.
thanks,
Peter
The draft references RFC5286 for LFA which defines link/node/SRLG
protecting LFAs, but they are of a different category, right? TI-LFA for
e.g. could be link/node/SRLG protecting..
Regards,
Muthu
_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
