Robert,
On 28/08/2023 14:19, Robert Raszuk wrote:
Daniel,
> [DV] No, there’s no need to leak and advertise
You mean there is no need for RFC9352 in your network. If so - great.
I was however asking the question: if network needs to advertise any of
the information defined in RFC9352 would it still benefit from UPA ?
ISIS SIDs are not needed outside of its area. Service SIDs are
advertised by BGP.
thanks,
Peter
Thx,
R.
On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 11:05 PM Voyer, Daniel <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi Robert, inlines____
__ __
__ __
*From: *Lsr <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> on
behalf of Robert Raszuk <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
*Date: *Monday, August 28, 2023 at 12:00 PM
*To: *"Hassan, Shehzad" <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>, Daniel Bernier
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
*Cc: *lsr <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>,
"[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>"
<[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
*Subject: *[EXT]Re: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption of "IGP Unreachable
Prefix Announcement" -
draft-ppsenak-lsr-igp-ureach-prefix-announce-04 (Fixed draft name)____
__ __
Hi Shehzad & Daniel,____
____
I support this work as it is key for summarization in an
SRv6/IPv6 network.____
__ __
Are you not going to advertise and leak across your IGP domain any
of the SRv6 extensions as described in
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc9352/
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc9352/> for the PEs ? ____
[DV] No, there’s no need to leak and advertise. For an SRv6 network,
we are summarizing locators and loopback (should be derived from
locator 0). This makes the routing domain “opaque”.____
__ __
And if you do, is there still some use case for UPA ? ____
__ __
Perhaps I am missing something but how would those extensions
survive summarization ? ____
__ __
__ __
Thx,
Robert____
Cheers,____
Dan____
__ __
> On Aug 23, 2023, at 4:07 PM, Acee Lindem <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
> LSR Working Group,
>
> This begins the working group adoption call for “IGP
Unreachable Prefix Announcement” -
draft-ppsenak-lsr-igp-unreach-prefix-announce-04.
> Please indicate your support or objection on this list prior
to September 7th, 2023.
>
> Thanks,
> Acee
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> External Email: Please use caution when opening links and
attachments / Courriel externe: Soyez prudent avec les liens et
documents joints
>
_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
<https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>____
_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
