Object its adoption. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wang-lsr-prefix-unreachable-annoucement/ (PUA) covering all use cases and scenarios in this document, the PUA describes additional more useful use cases and scenarios, including: 1. PUA solves area/domain partition, which is necessary because it often occurs on the network. 2. PUA describes a detailed solution to the number of unreachable prefixes that exceed the limit. 3. PUA describes the rules for selecting reachable prefixes and unreachable prefixes. I think this content is very useful and necessary. It is recommended that the LSR working group adopt a more mature and comprehensive solution.
Thank you. Zhibo Hu > -----Original Message----- > From: Lsr [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Acee Lindem > Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2023 3:58 AM > To: [email protected] > Cc: lsr <[email protected]> > Subject: [Lsr] IPR Poll for Working Group Adoption of "IGP Unreachable > Prefix Announcement" - > draft-ppsenak-lsr-igp-unreach-prefix-announce-04 > > Co-Authors, > > Are you aware of any IPR that applies to > draft-posenak-lsr-igp-unreach-prefix-announce-04? > If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see > RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). > > There are a few IPR statements already - > https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?submit=draft&id=draft-ietf-lsr-dyn > amic-flooding > > If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to > this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. > *The response needs to be sent to the LSR WG mailing > list.* The document will not advance to the next stage until a response has > been received from each author and contributor. > > If you are on the LSR WG email list but are not listed as an author or > contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR > that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. > > Also, since there are nine authors, it would be great if you could reduce > the author list and make the others contributors (which still requires an > IPR response). > > Thanks, > Acee > _______________________________________________ > Lsr mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
