Hi,
Background: those 2 documents have just been assigned YD review, I am reviewing
OSPF and Jan is reviewing ISIS.
Was an effort made to keep those 2 documents aligned/in-sync where
possible/desirable? My expectation is that the SR specifics would be
near-identical in the 2 documents. e.g. shouldn't the capabilities for the 2
protocols be very similar.Here are some differences which don't seem justifie:-
sr-algorithm in ISIS is a uint8 and in OSPF is an identityref- range-size is a
uint32 in ISIS and is a uint24 in OSPF
augment /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols
/rt:control-plane-protocol/isis:isis/isis:database
/isis:levels/isis:lsp/isis:router-capabilities:
+--ro sr-capability
| +--ro sr-capability
| | +--ro sr-capability-bits* identityref
| +--ro global-blocks
| +--ro global-block* []
| +--ro range-size? uint32
| +--ro sid-sub-tlv
| +--ro sid? uint32
+--ro sr-algorithms
| +--ro sr-algorithm* uint8
+--ro local-blocks
| +--ro local-block* []
| +--ro range-size? uint32
| +--ro sid-sub-tlv
| +--ro sid? uint32
+--ro srms-preference
+--ro preference? uint8
augment /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols
/rt:control-plane-protocol/ospf:ospf/ospf:areas/ospf:area
/ospf:interfaces/ospf:interface/ospf:database
/ospf:link-scope-lsa-type/ospf:link-scope-lsas
/ospf:link-scope-lsa/ospf:version/ospf:ospfv2/ospf:ospfv2
/ospf:body/ospf:opaque/ospf:ri-opaque:
+--ro sr-algorithm-tlv
| +--ro sr-algorithm* identityref
+--ro sid-range-tlvs
| +--ro sid-range-tlv* []
| +--ro range-size? rt-types:uint24
| +--ro sid-sub-tlv
| +--ro sid? uint32
+--ro local-block-tlvs
| +--ro local-block-tlv* []
| +--ro range-size? rt-types:uint24
| +--ro sid-sub-tlv
| +--ro sid? uint32
+--ro srms-preference-tlv
+--ro preference? uint8
Disclaimer: I don't follow LSR...
Regards,Reshad._______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
