The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8667, "IS-IS Extensions for Segment Routing".
-------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7722 -------------------------------------- Type: Editorial Reported by: John Scudder <[email protected]> Section: 2.1.1.1 Original Text ------------- 2.1.1.1. V-Flag and L-Flag Corrected Text -------------- 2.1.1.1. V-Flag, L-Flag, and the SID/Index/Label Field Notes ----- Since the SID/Index/Label field is defined in this subsection, it's misleading for the title to mention only the flags and is a disservice to readers using the document as a reference. This is also discussed in https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/56_LEEZvHDHrnkC98f7BtpOkkY0/ where Acee also suggests a broader clarification. The narrowly-scoped change reflected in this erratum seems sufficient to fix the problem I encountered; in my view, it doesn't preclude an additional erratum for some of the other matters that were mentioned by Acee if there's support for that as well. Thanks to Tony Li for suggesting the wording. Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". (If it is spam, it will be removed shortly by the RFC Production Center.) Please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party will log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC8667 (draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions-25) -------------------------------------- Title : IS-IS Extensions for Segment Routing Publication Date : December 2019 Author(s) : S. Previdi, Ed., L. Ginsberg, Ed., C. Filsfils, A. Bashandy, H. Gredler, B. Decraene Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Link State Routing Area : Routing Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
