The following errata report has been verified for RFC8667, "IS-IS Extensions for Segment Routing".
-------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7722 -------------------------------------- Status: Verified Type: Editorial Reported by: John Scudder <[email protected]> Date Reported: 2023-12-07 Verified by: Andrew Alston (IESG) Section: 2.1.1.1 Original Text ------------- 2.1.1.1. V-Flag and L-Flag Corrected Text -------------- 2.1.1.1. V-Flag, L-Flag, and the SID/Index/Label Field Notes ----- Since the SID/Index/Label field is defined in this subsection, it's misleading for the title to mention only the flags and is a disservice to readers using the document as a reference. This is also discussed in https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/56_LEEZvHDHrnkC98f7BtpOkkY0/ where Acee also suggests a broader clarification. The narrowly-scoped change reflected in this erratum seems sufficient to fix the problem I encountered; in my view, it doesn't preclude an additional erratum for some of the other matters that were mentioned by Acee if there's support for that as well. Thanks to Tony Li for suggesting the wording. <Andrew Note> I agree this helps clarify the text which could easily have otherwise been misread - hence the verification of the errata -------------------------------------- RFC8667 (draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions-25) -------------------------------------- Title : IS-IS Extensions for Segment Routing Publication Date : December 2019 Author(s) : S. Previdi, Ed., L. Ginsberg, Ed., C. Filsfils, A. Bashandy, H. Gredler, B. Decraene Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Link State Routing Area : Routing Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
