Tom - At some point the WG chairs might want to respond, but the simple answer to this "mystery" has to do with when a document became an RFC.
LSR WG was formed in early 2018. It took over the work that was previously done by the OSPF WG (https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/ospf/documents/ ) and the IS-IS WG (https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/isis/documents/ ). If a document became an RFC after the LSR WG took over, then it is listed on LSR page - if the document became an RFC before then it is listed either on the OSPF page or the IS-IS page. If you look at those pages you will see that each WG produced a large number of documents - not sure if it would make sense to move/copy all of that to the LSR page. I will let the WG chairs comment on that. For myself, if I want to find an RFC, I simply put "RFCxxxx" into my favorite search tool and it is quickly found. Les > -----Original Message----- > From: tom petch <ie...@btconnect.com> > Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2023 9:34 AM > To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) <ginsb...@cisco.com>; lsr-cha...@ietf.org > Cc: lsr@ietf.org > Subject: Re: RFC8665 > > From: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) <ginsb...@cisco.com> > Sent: 11 December 2023 16:42 > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc8665/ > > And there is a link to it here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/ospf/documents/ > > Not sure why you are having issues. > > <tp> > > Because the link is missing, missing from where it would be most useful, in > the > page for the LSR WG, the part that lists the RFC, the part that, inter alia, > lists > RFC8666 and RFC8667. > I have come to rely on the page for the WG to link to most of the documents I > need to reference to review eg ospf-sr-yang. > > And it is not there. > > Yes there are other links to it on other pages which just consumes more of my > time to find. > > I am thinking that the metadata may be wrong and there will be other > problems but as yet have no evidence thereof. > > Tom Petch > > > > Les > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Lsr <lsr-boun...@ietf.org> On Behalf Of tom petch > > Sent: Monday, December 11, 2023 4:02 AM > > To: lsr-cha...@ietf.org > > Cc: lsr@ietf.org > > Subject: [Lsr] RFC8665 > > > > I look in vain in the datatracker for RFC8665. > > > > Document search finds it, the data tracker does not list it. > > > > I realise that it is not a product of the lsr WG but then neither are > > RFC9129 or > > RFC8920 AFAICTand they are listed. > > > > Odd; well, irritating to be precise. > > > > Tom Petch > > _______________________________________________ > > Lsr mailing list > > Lsr@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
