Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-lsr-isis-area-proxy-11: Discuss
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-isis-area-proxy/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- DISCUSS: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ** Section 4.3. Do all the candidates need the Area Proxy System Identifier TLVs need the same system identifier? -- Section 4.2 says “For consistency, all Area Leader candidates SHOULD be configured with the same Proxy System ID, Proxy Hostname, and any other information that may be inserted into the Proxy LSP.” -- Section 4.3.1 says: “All candidates advertising the Area Proxy System Identifier TLV MUST be advertising the same system identifier.” The first statement suggests that consistency might not always be required, but the second statement is clear that it always must be the same identifier. Per our discussion on https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/HbpEgfX4p7rSMr490kylMyy5pFA, I believe the agreed resolution is to s/MUST/SHOULD/ in Section 4.3.1. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thank you to Alexey Melnikov for the SECDIR review. ** Section 8. 8. Security Considerations This document introduces no new security issues. Security of routing within a domain is already addressed as part of the routing protocols themselves. This document proposes no changes to those security architectures. -- What are the relevant pointers to IS-IS security considerations? Per https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/HbpEgfX4p7rSMr490kylMyy5pFA/, please consider adding references to RFC 5304 and 5310. _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
