Hi Jie, I asked this when the flag was added to IS-IS and then to OSPFv3. I agree it would be good to know why knowing a prefix is an Anycast address is "useful" when the whole point is that you use the closest one (or some other criteria).
Thanks, Acee > On Mar 20, 2024, at 9:09 AM, Dongjie (Jimmy) <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi authors, > > I just read this document. Maybe I didn't follow the previous discussion, but > it seems in the current version it does not describe how this newly defined > flag would be used by the receiving IGP nodes? > > Best regards, > Jie > > -----Original Message----- > From: Lsr <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Acee Lindem > Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2024 4:43 AM > To: lsr <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption Poll for "Updates to Anycast Property > advertisement for OSPFv2" - draft-chen-lsr-anycast-flag-06 > > > This starts the Working Group adoption call for draft-chen-lsr-anycast-flag. > This is a simple OSPFv2 maintenance draft adding an Anycast flag for IPv4 > prefixes to align with IS-IS and OSPFv3. > > Please send your support or objection to this list before April 6th, 2024. > > Thanks, > Acee > > > _______________________________________________ > Lsr mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
