Internet-Draft draft-ietf-lsr-distoptflood-04.txt is now available. It is a
work item of the Link State Routing (LSR) WG of the IETF.

   Title:   IS-IS Distributed Flooding Reduction
   Authors: Russ White
            Shraddha Hegde
            Tony Przygienda
            Luay Jalil
   Name:    draft-ietf-lsr-distoptflood-04.txt
   Pages:   15
   Dates:   2024-04-29

Abstract:

   In dense topologies (such as data center fabrics based on the Clos
   and butterfly though not limited to those; in fact any topology with
   relatively high degree of connectivity qualifies here) IGP flooding
   mechanisms designed originally for rather sparse topologies can
   "overflood", or in other words generate too many identical copies of
   same information arriving at a given node from other devices.  This
   normally results in slower convergence times and higher resource
   utilization to process and discard the superfluous copies.
   Distributed algorithms that restrict the amount of flooding performed
   can be constructed, as long as they result in a flooding subgraph
   connecting all nodes on the network in terms of flooding still.  Such
   algorithms can reduce resource utilization significantly, while
   improving convergence performance.  We denote such algorithm as
   "distributed flooding prunners" (or "prunner" for short) while
   requiring them to follow some simple, additional rules.  The rules
   presented in detail later allow to deploy mix of nodes any prunning
   algorithm and multiple prunners at the same time if necessary while
   ensuring correct flood coverage for the whole network.  Additionally,
   node by node migration, without flag day, from one algorithm to
   another if necessary is possible.  And assuming the algorithms are
   behaving correctly, the blast radius on algorithm change is normally
   contained to a single node performing the switch and obviously the
   convergence of an algorithm on introduction or removal of node
   running such algorithm.

   One such algorithm (modification of previous art), deployable even
   without configuration, is described in this document.  Beside
   reducing the extraneous copies, the proposed solution does "load-
   balance" flooding across different possible paths in the network to
   prevent build up of flooding hot-spots.

The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-distoptflood/

There is also an HTML version available at:
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-lsr-distoptflood-04.html

A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-lsr-distoptflood-04

Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at:
rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts


_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
Lsr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr

Reply via email to