Hello All,
I've reviewed both an earlier and the latest versions of this draft. I
support its publication as this is a very useful extension - especially
association of tags with intra/inter area prefixes has been missing.
Some nits/editorial comments:
1) Suggest removing the sentence referencing the equivalent ISIS RFC from
the abstract.
2) Section 1: s/considered but discard/considered but discarded
3) Section 2:
OLD:
Length A 16-bit field that indicates the length of the value
portion in octets and MUST be a multiple of 4 octets dependent on the
number of administrative tags advertised. At least one administrative tag
must be advertised.
NEW:
Length A 16-bit field that indicates the length of the
value portion in octets dependent on the number of administrative
tags advertised. It MUST be a multiple of 4 octets and at least one
administrative tag MUST be advertised.
4) Section 3: suggest to change from numbered list to bullet list for
better readability.
Thanks,
Ketan
On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 12:15 AM Christian Hopps <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> This begins a 2 week WG Last Call, ending Monday July 1st, 2024, for:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-admin-tags
>
> Authors,
>
> Please indicate to the list, your knowledge of any IPR related to this
> work.
>
> Thanks,
> Chris.
> _______________________________________________
> Lsr mailing list -- [email protected]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
>
_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
