Hi Tony, Thats sad!! So we don't know why that IANA policy was selected but we know that is not useful anymore hence the update.
//Zahed On Thu, Aug 8, 2024 at 9:52 AM Tony Li <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Zaheduzzaman, > > Unfortunately, the authors of RFC 5029 left us no note as to their > motivations. > > Regards, > Tony > > > On Aug 8, 2024, at 12:43 AM, Zaheduzzaman Sarker via Datatracker < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > Zaheduzzaman Sarker has entered the following ballot position for > > draft-ietf-lsr-labv-registration-03: No Objection > > > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > > > > Please refer to > https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ > > for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-labv-registration/ > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > COMMENT: > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > Thanks for working on this. It seems useful change to me. However, I or > the > > reader would be benefited to know why this was "standard required" in > the first > > place, then describe why it is required to be changed. > > > > > > > >
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
