The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7684, "OSPFv2 Prefix/Link Attribute Advertisement".
-------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid8104 -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: Kris Michielsen <[email protected]> Section: 2.1 Original Text ------------- Route Type The type of the OSPFv2 route. If the route type is 0 (Unspecified), the information inside the OSPFv2 External Prefix TLV applies to the prefix regardless of prefix's route type. This is useful when prefix-specific attributes are advertised by an external entity that is not aware of the route type associated with the prefix. Supported types are: Corrected Text -------------- Route Type The type of the OSPFv2 route. If the route type is 0 (Unspecified), the information inside the OSPFv2 Extended Prefix TLV applies to the prefix regardless of prefix's route type. This is useful when prefix-specific attributes are advertised by an external entity that is not aware of the route type associated with the prefix. Supported types are: Notes ----- s/External Prefix/Extended Prefix/ Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". (If it is spam, it will be removed shortly by the RFC Production Center.) Please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party will log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC7684 (draft-ietf-ospf-prefix-link-attr-13) -------------------------------------- Title : OSPFv2 Prefix/Link Attribute Advertisement Publication Date : November 2015 Author(s) : P. Psenak, H. Gredler, R. Shakir, W. Henderickx, J. Tantsura, A. Lindem Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Open Shortest Path First IGP Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
