> On Oct 16, 2024, at 01:39, Harish R Prabhu <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi experts,
>
> My question is with regards to the OSPF yang scheme.
>
> RFC 5340 allows configuring multiple interfaces on the same link.
>
> As per my understanding on a linux machine,
>
> eth0 can be a link
> IPv6 address A/B would be one interface
> IPv6 address C/D could be another interface.
> Is this understanding correct?
>
> If so, why can't I configure interfaces selectively on a link today? For
> example, I want only A/B to be part of OSPF routing, not the other one (using
> the above example).? The doubt arises because there is no address
> configuration parameter for OSPF interfaces.
In OSPFv3, the protocol runs on the link and not a specific subnet.
The instance ID is in the YANG model (RFC 9129).
grouping ospfv3-interface-config {
description
"OSPFv3 interface-specific configuration state.";
leaf instance-id {
type uint8;
default "0";
description
"OSPFv3 instance ID.";
}
}
Hope this helps,
Acee
>
> Also as per 5340 interface id, and interface instance id is required for
> supporting multiple interfaces. But i do not see interface id in the yang
> specification.
>
> What am I missing? Maybe these are already answered previously in the mailing
> list. Please bear with me, appreciate the patience and answers from the
> experts.
>
> Thanks,
> Harish
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Harish R Prabhu
> --
> Bangalore, India.
> [email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>_______________________________________________
> Lsr mailing list -- [email protected]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
