I concur as well. One more important point – the solution defined in draft-ietf-lsr-multi-tlv has been implemented – by multiple vendors. It has been tested. It has been deployed. It has been proven to interoperate.
We know this works not just because we think it should – but because we have running code. Les From: Tony Li <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Tony Li Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2024 5:09 PM To: Acee Lindem <[email protected]> Cc: Aijun Wang <[email protected]>; Christian Hopps <[email protected]>; Yingzhen Qu <[email protected]>; lsr-chairs <[email protected]>; [email protected]; lsr <[email protected]> Subject: [Lsr] Re: It's time to find one general solution to Big-TLV problem Re: IETF 121 LSR Slot Requests On Oct 22, 2024, at 4:53 PM, Acee Lindem - acee.ietf at gmail.com <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Since my implementation and deployment experience is primarily in OSPFv(2|3) I’d appreciate those with more IS-IS experience (both implementation and deployment) to chime in. I concur. T
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
