Mach - > I hadn’t closely followed this topic’s discussion before, but after taking on > this > review task, I read most of the related emails. I remain unconvinced by the > idea that we should ‘rely on experienced ISIS implementers to understand the > composition of each MP-TLV Key.’ While this document does not alter the MP- > TLV encoding, it introduces the concept of a Key and specific operations > involving it, such as copying the Key across different MP-TLV parts or > correlating ML-TLV parts by the Key. These operations are not required by the > original MP-TLV RFCs, so it is this document’s responsibility to define what > constitutes the MP-TLV Key to ensure these operations can be implemented > correctly.
[LES: _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
