Speaking as WG member: I support publication of the document. The defined prefix option flag fields and registries are required for OSPF extendibility.
I have comments both to improve the text and align it with existing OSPF documents (see attached). Thanks, Acee
<<< text/html; x-unix-mode=0644; name="draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-extended-flags-03-orig.diff.html": Unrecognized >>>
> On Dec 20, 2024, at 13:26, Acee Lindem <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > This email begins a 2 week WG Last Call for the following draft: "Prefix Flag > Extension for OSPFv2 and OSPFv3" - > draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-extended-flags-03 > > Please review the document and indicate your support or objections by January > 11th, 2025. The extra week is to allow for the holidays. > > Thanks, > Acee > >
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
