If all the ADs are happy, then the document shepherd is definitely happy!!!
Thanks,
Acee

> On Apr 8, 2025, at 12:07 PM, Mahesh Jethanandani <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
> Hi Ran,
> 
> The changes look good to me. Thanks for addressing them.
> 
>> On Apr 8, 2025, at 3:48 AM, <[email protected]> <[email protected]> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Mahesh,Tony,
>> Thank you very much for your review.
>> Please find the updated version attached, which reflects your comments as 
>> well as feedback from other ADs and DIR.
>> We would appreciate it if you could review the changes and confirm whether 
>> they  address your concerns. Should there be any remaining issues, please do 
>> not hesitate to inform us.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Best Regards,
>> Ran
>> Original
>> From: MaheshJethanandaniviaDatatracker <[email protected]>
>> To: The IESG <[email protected]>;
>> Cc: [email protected] 
>> <[email protected]>;[email protected] 
>> <[email protected]>;[email protected] <[email protected]>;[email protected] 
>> <[email protected]>;[email protected] <[email protected]>;
>> Date: 2025年04月01日 06:03
>> Subject: Mahesh Jethanandani's No Objection on 
>> draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-extended-flags-06: (with COMMENT)
>> Mahesh Jethanandani has entered the following ballot position for
>> draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-extended-flags-06: No Objection
>> 
>> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
>> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
>> introductory paragraph, however.)
>> 
>> 
>> Please refer to 
>> https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
>>  
>> for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>> 
>> 
>> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-extended-flags/
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> COMMENT:
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> 
>> Section 2, paragraph 7
>> >    Prefix Attribute Flags: Variable.  The extended flag field.  This
>> >    contains a variable number of 32-bit flags.  Currently, no bits are
>> >    defined in this document.
>> 
>> Thanks to Tony Li for his OPSDIR review. In that review, he points out a few
>> nits, which have been agreed upon with the authors. Just putting it here so 
>> it
>> can be tracked and checked once the next version of the draft has been 
>> posted.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> <draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-extended-flags-07.diff 
>> .html><draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-extended-flags-07.html>
> 
> 
> 
> Mahesh Jethanandani
> [email protected]
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to