I support adoption.
It is true that I have opposed the leaderless approach in the past - and I am
still not a fan of this approach.
However, it is clear that the WG/industry has an interest in this approach.
I believe the latest version of the draft does an excellent job of defining the
architecture for this approach as an alternative to (not a replacement for) the
leader based approach defined in RFC 9667.
If we are to respond to the desires of the industry we therefore should move
forward with this draft.
Les
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Acee Lindem <[email protected]>
> Sent: Sunday, April 27, 2025 7:40 AM
> To: lsr <[email protected]>
> Cc: Tony Przygienda <[email protected]>; shraddha
> <[email protected]>
> Subject: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for "Flooding Reduction Algorithms
> Framework" - draft-prz-lsr-interop-flood-reduction-architecture-01
>
> LSR WG,
>
> This starts the Working Group adoption call for draft-prz-lsr-interop-flood-
> reduction-architecture-01. Please send your
> support or objection to this list before Monday, May 12th, 2025.
>
> Thanks,
> Acee
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lsr mailing list -- [email protected]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
