Then, what’s the differences between the two statements:

 

“UPA advertisements SHOULD therefore be withdrawn after some amount of time, 
that would provides sufficient time for UPA to be flooded network-wide and 
acted upon by receiving nodes, but limits the presence of UPA in the network.”

 

And:

 

“ABR or ASBR MUST withdraw the previously advertised UPA when the reason for 
which the UPA was generated was lost - e.g. prefix reachability was restored or 
its metric has changed such that it does not represent the protocol specific 
maximum prefix metric.”

 

Here, does  “withdraw” just mean to “stop advertisement”?  If no, what’s the 
mechanism of second “withdraw”?

 

 

Best Regards

 

Aijun Wang

China Telecom

 

发件人: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] 代表 
Peter Psenak
发送时间: 2025年5月23日 14:55
收件人: Aijun Wang <[email protected]>; [email protected]
主题: [Lsr] Re: 答复: I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-igp-ureach-prefix-announce-06.txt

 

On 23/05/2025 03:32, Aijun Wang wrote:

Hi, All:

 

I must point out that the updated draft doesn't address previous issues that 
described in [1].

Especially, the activation of flawed LSInfinity feature(there is detail 
analysis for this flawed feature that is defined in OSPF 2328).

 

And, some updated contents will deteriorate the traffic pattern within the 
network. 

For example, It says: “ABR or ASBR MUST withdraw the previously advertised UPA 
when the reason for which the UPA was generated was lost”.

The above requirement will advertise the specific prefixes within the network, 
which will weaken the original summary effect, and attract the traffic via one 
or some of ABRs.  

no, above is not true, the new text does not say to advertise reachablity for a 
summarized prefix, it only talks about removing the previously advertised UPA. 

Please read carefully before commenting.

Peter

 

 

[1]: Reasons of abandoning UPA: 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wang-lsr-reasons-of-abandon-upa-proposal/

 

 

Best Regards

 

Aijun Wang

China Telecom

 

 

 

 

 

-----邮件原件-----
发件人: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>  
[mailto:[email protected]] 代表 [email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> 
发送时间: 2025年5月22日 21:20
收件人: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
抄送: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
主题: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-igp-ureach-prefix-announce-06.txt

 

Internet-Draft draft-ietf-lsr-igp-ureach-prefix-announce-06.txt is now 
available. It is a work item of the Link State Routing (LSR) WG of the IETF.

 

   Title:   IGP Unreachable Prefix Announcement

   Authors: Peter Psenak

            Clarence Filsfils

            Daniel Voyer

            Shraddha Hegde

            Gyan Mishra

   Name:    draft-ietf-lsr-igp-ureach-prefix-announce-06.txt

   Pages:   14

   Dates:   2025-05-22

 

Abstract:

 

   In the presence of summarization, there is a need to signal loss of

   reachability to an individual prefix covered by the summary.  This

   enables fast convergence by steering traffic away from the node which

   owns the prefix and is no longer reachable.

 

   This document describes how to use the existing protocol mechanisms

   in IS-IS and OSPF, together with the two new flags, to advertise such

   prefix reachability loss.

 

The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is:

 <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-igp-ureach-prefix-announce/> 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-igp-ureach-prefix-announce/

 

There is also an HTMLized version available at:

 
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-lsr-igp-ureach-prefix-announce-06>
 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-lsr-igp-ureach-prefix-announce-06

 

A diff from the previous version is available at:

 
<https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-lsr-igp-ureach-prefix-announce-06>
 
https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-lsr-igp-ureach-prefix-announce-06

 

Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at:

rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts

 

 

_______________________________________________

Lsr mailing list --  <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]

To unsubscribe send an email to  <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]

 

_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to